I
posted last year on the reasons for climate denialism among educated
Republicans. This is a less philosophical take, published this week
in my local newspaper,
The Yancey Common Times Journal.
Locally, public denial
of climate change comes almost exclusively from a Confederate
re-enactor who has a PhD in one of the subdisciplines of physics. Of
course, this individual covers for more covert denialists. Being
fair, the editor of this paper will continue to publish his letters.
But this does not give equal weight to his arguments. His key
assertion is that, contrary to the claims of climate scientists, US
temperatures are going down rather than up! He “proves” this via
graphs which he manipulates to show false peaks and valleys. If the
graphs are incomplete, or falsely labeled, this is easy to do. What
enables him to do this is the lack of scientific literacy in the
general public. We can be thankful that we have competent science
teachers like Chris Bocci to help alter this pattern.
The issue, even for the
most conservative politicians – yes, sadly this is about politics,
driven by partial and distorted science – is not whether global
temperatures are rising, but the cause. The alarming melt of the
polar icecaps along with the world's glaciers and the rapid increase
in desertification – including the American Southwest – all
testify that the world is warming, much more rapidly at the poles
than at the center. What these politicians, fueled by a few renegade
scientists, claim is that there is no proof that this is being caused
by human activity. There is not space here to marshall the data that
show that, to the contrary,
we are the Flood.
More than 95% of the world's climate scientists are convinced by
this data, and a steady trickle of deniers among them is shifting.
The prime example is Richard Muller, Berkeley scientist who completed
a study recalculating 1.6 billion pieces of climate data last year
that showed “essentially all of this increase results from human
emission of greenhouse gases” (“The Conversion of a Climate
Skeptic” NYT op-ed, July 2012). The study's main funder was
the Koch brothers, who have heavily supported the climate denialist
lobby. Oops!
Why
are conservatives in denial? Because they have no doubt that we are
the all-powerful king of species, and that anything we might do to
curb our power would be willful abdication of our kingship.
The
paradox is that while we are told in Genesis that we are made in the
image of God, godlike. Yet we usurp Him, working more and more
against Creation rather than with it. Indeed, a secular
pseudo-environmentalist recently wrote a book called The God Species, in which he
argues that we are capable of undoing any mess we have created
through our godlike creativity.
Are
you uncomfortable yet? I am. As a college humanities teacher, one
of my favorite teaching texts was the Book of Job. The whole of this
magnificent Creation mirrors the glory and power of God, not man. We
may be made in His image, but we are also capable of sin. The best
path when we recognize our sin is to ask forgiveness and try to right
our path, not to enter ever more deeply into it.
We
are comfortable (like Job's self-satisfied friends) with the benefits
of a fossil-fueled world. Rather than moving away from our personal
comforts and the vast corporate profits riding on them, it might be
easier to trust technocrats to save us from ourselves and the fossil
behemoths. As we approach the point of no return with respect to
climate disequilibrium, the most tempting action for the God Species
is to seed the poles with sulfur dioxide, which would simulate a
global series of volcanic eruptions, cooling the atmosphere by
blocking the sun's incoming rays. Leaving aside the multitude of
unknowns in this scenario, one thing is clear. If we resort to this
desperate move, we will have no more blue sky until we stop injecting
sulfur dioxide. How important is blue sky to you? How does it
compare to the benefits of the internal combustion engine and
unlimited electricity?
The common thread that
drives denialists is pride and arrogance. This is true of
technocrats from the scientific-industrial complex, the captains of
industry and their handmaids on the political right. Only chickens,
crying liberals, would turn back when we are on the verge of
bioengineering our crops and children, and geoengineering our
atmosphere. Right?
Isn't
it odd that it's the liberals who align with the New Testament values
of social justice? Friends, the “Christian right” is not
Christian at all, but cheerleaders for a state religion that has been
the bane of the West since Constantine. (And let's not call it “Old
Testament” religion, for the Jews have a doctrine called tikkun
– the necessity of mending the world that we have broken.) We lack
New Testament literacy as well as scientific literacy. We are badly
lost, in a state of alienation from our Creator, not only with
climate denialism but in the monstrous overreach of the majority in
Raleigh - sadly by all
three branches of
government. But that is another subject, rightfully the domain of
folks fired by the social gospel, sponsors of Moral Mondays across
our dear beleaguered Old North State.
Our walk ended with a lively march,
escorted by the police, from St Stephen's Church to Lafayette Park,
facing the White House. We were greeted by friendly supporters all
along the route. Our message to the President was “Keep your
promise” on the Keystone, XL Pipeline, something that recent
remarks indicate he is inching towards. Our 75-odd marchers now
numbered around 350, swelling to near 500 at the Park, where a lively
crowd greeted us. So did a SWAT team, who were there to investigate a
bomb threat. Our formal rally was thus delayed by almost an hour,
but nobody left.
After the park was cleared and the
policeman with the submachine gun who had greeted us left, we held
the rally, featuring young folks from
iMatter and the march
organizers. Appropriately, the twin focus was upon youth and the
over-65 generation, the grandparents. The most poignant pleas from
the youth were from an Eskimo boy whose entire town had slid into the
Arctic Sea due to erosion from Global Warming and a Navaho girl whose
family had lost their farm to severe drought and total loss of their
water. My young marching friend Alex was there to read from his
rewrite of the Declaration as one of Energy Independence, and it was
unfurled 175 feet to display the signatures of 75,000, including
John Kerry, Barbara Boxer, and yours truly. We were asked to
solemnly pledge ourselves to massive reduction in use of fossil
fuels, something we were demanding of our government and
corporations. This gave me pause, as I've cut back to half the
average American, but hit a wall a few years ago. I still fly
airplanes, no matter the Prius, which drive more than ever from our
remote rural base in the mountains. Busy lives, spewing carbon. But
I raised my hand.
The Asheville Green Grannies sang smart lyrics to choice oldies,
pointing fingers at the White House as they reminded the President of
his promises (the biggest is his 2008 campaign promise: “Let us be
the generation that finally frees itself from the tyranny of oil”).
All three of the faithful Siler family spoke: young Leigh, repeating
her wish that future children be able to enjoy the rich rural life
she has; her father Mark, rousing us with all of our slogans, a
surprising orator in our midst.
And then came Mahan, whose
speech was an arrow straight into my heart. At 79, he was our oldest
marcher (Leigh at 11 was the youngest). A retired Baptist preacher, he
spoke eloquently about the responsibility of the Boomers present. We
have unprecedented life expectancies and wealth – neither of which
our grandchildren will have – and an unprecedented challenge.
“Don't retire – RECOMMIT!” Then he gave us a fitting image for
what was unfolding at this rally. He asked those under 19 to make a
central circle, facing out to the rest of us. We reached our hands
towards each other, some grabbing hold, others holding shoulders and
backs, like a healing. He described two arcs, one of the children
reaching up from the earth, a second of the over-65's rising to meet
it, forming a
Keystone.
“They
are not the Keystone, we are, at this place of meeting. Let's take
back this lovely word.” His words and our action said it all..
Friends, may we all answer Mahan Siler's challenge and retake the
Keystone, resting the whole butressed rainbow in God's everloving hands.
Environmental Resources Management was a good target, and the secret was
well-guarded by the walk organizers. On Wednesday evening they gave
a detailed briefing on the action, it's general location, and the
form it would take (some locking themselves together in the corporate
offices while others distracted the guard, still others outside
raising a ruckus). I was intrigued, but Geeta and I decided to stick
with our original intention to complete the walk. The traveling
community, erecting our tent city each evening in a new site, was
really growing on me. But I would miss the fellow walkers, some now
friends, who were leaving us for the training and action.
The
action at ERM was scheduled for noon. The day of the action, a few
walkers left at dawn to be able to join it, 13.5 miles distant.
Others took rides to the metro with the same intention. The rest of
us waited for the day walkers, who had been instructed to join us at
nine. About a half dozen did so, with others swelling our ranks as we
neared the capital. One cheery young woman calmly emerged from the
forested banks of the Potomac, a lovely woodsprite affirming our
purpose. As was the case all along the walk, I had probing talks
with other walkers, this day with a man who had just joined the
movement last fall. When we reached Georgetown, he unfurled his
banner, proclaiming the Great Turning and the end of Fossil Folly. On
it was written the names of his grandchildren, one just adopted the
week before after a long struggle (thus “Hope” was crossed out,
replaced by Bryan). More and more of the folks I meet in these
actions have never done any kind of activism before. Many spoke of
their awakening, and the tempo is accelerating.
Though
the company was surprised they were the target, the police arrived
swiftly, and it was all over in fifteen minutes or so. They arrived
with wire-cutters, paddy wagons, and plenty of plastic handcuffs. As
the 54 who were arrested left in their custody, there were huge
smiles, cuffed hands raised overhead, and frequent applause. This
was a celebration, though at least some would need to return for a
court date in mid-August, which could be a problem for my new friend
Deborah from Seattle, at her first action. But as my brother-in-law
the police dispatcher says, “That's a first-world problem.” This
is not Syria, nor Russia, nor Turkey.
We
arrived at the site of the civil disobedience around three pm, well
after it ended. The police returned from lunch to face a second wave
of protesters. We did not see them as the enemy, and when I saw the
video footage recording the warning from a company employee that he
would call the police if the intruders didn't leave, I heard one
woman say “Thank you.” Unlike previous 350.org civil disobedience actions, this one was not scripted,
since the target remained secret. But each side still knew what to
expect from the other. This is a dance we do in our democracy, and
without the police doing their part, it would be incomplete, and our
message would be lost. As the commander said to Geeta (he looked like
a glamorous politician, an impeccable diplomat), “This is not
Syria. We are here to protect your right of grievance to your
government .” We are blessed to be able to dance our protest and
sing out our grievances.
One
thing that disturbed me about the action was the rowdy chanting of
slogans, both on the street and inside the building. I would prefer
dignified silence, punctuated by eloquent signage. Even a clever
chant sounds adolescent when amplified by a crowd. I have been part
of three acts of civil disobedience, and though we sang, and even
chanted some, there was a more dignified tone. The chanting at ERM
did not reach the strident pitch which so put me off during the
Vietnam War protests, but the more I do activist work, the more I
yearn for dignity throughout. That was what I experienced at the
Interfaith Moral Action on Climate, IMAC, in January. I am
sure the training was thorough, undertaken by some of the same
trainers at the same church, St Stephens Episcopal, where we trained
for the August 2011 Keystone action at the White House. But I miss
the silent witness, the meditative prayer, inviting everyone on all
sides to plumb their depths.