I
must confess to feeling like I’ve been traversing a morass, the
molasses-tarbaby into
which I fell in the last
post. The whole point of “Losing Earth” and its critics is to
assign blame for our apparent failure to steward the Earth and to
steward a future for our offspring. I found myself agreeing in some
ways with both sides, thus the tarbaby.
But
what if there is no blame at the level of either individual choice or
social system/policy? There may well be something at the species
level that dooms us to prefer maximizing present advantages to
planning for a longterm future we can neither
understand nor
imagine. This is the position of Craig Dilworth, and I have yet
to read a a cogent counterargument to his Too
Smart for Our Own Good.
Another line of thinking derives
from Fermi’s Paradox, the apparent contradiction between the high
probability for the existence of extraterrestrial
civilizations
and the lack of evidence for them. As Fermi said, “Where is
everybody?” Robin Hanson and Glen Brin have responded with the
idea that the Great Silence with which we are greeted from apparently
dead space is caused by the “Great Filter”: it is in the nature
of advanced civilizations to destroy themselves before they get to
the point of colonizing other suitable planets. This occurs either
by (something like) nuclear
war, ecological collapse, or simply because complex civilizations fall victim to their own complexity.
One writer noted that the success of complex civilizations means
that they grow until they outstrip their energy resources, and in the
process doom themselves to death by carbon.
Advanced industrial civilizations
extract so much from their planetary base that they eventually
destroy their very conditions for life. If life on other planets –
and the odds are huge that it is commonplace in the universe – does
not reach the level of interplanetary communication or travel, then
it is either because it never reached the level of complexity of our
global civilization,
or it was able to restrain itself before it reached the Great Filter.
Many Hindu sages
point to the legend about
their ancient
forebears backing
off rocketry, because ancestral
sages foresaw the inevitable
results. This may not be
true, but respect for wisdom, rather than power, would certainly rein
in the potential for a civilization to project itself far into
interstellar space. But look
at India now, trying to be like the US as fast as possible, and using
more coal per energy unit than any other nation on Earth.
In the case of the lost
decade in the Climate Wars,
it is not neoliberalism per
se that was
the culprit. The
socio-political
structure was going to
somehow manifest
this flaw in hyperadvanced higher life forms.
I am a deeply spiritual person, and
I agree that the spiritual maturation of the species would mean that
anthropogenic climate change would never have become our endgame.
Nobody wants to give up on
the prospect of breaking
through to the level of species wisdom for which I referenced Joanna
Macy’s comments in my last post. As Thomas Berry wrote in The
Great Work, we need “to
reinvent the human at the species level.”
But when
Gary Snyder was
asked about when he thought
humans would reach that level, he answered with a chuckle, “ten
thousand years.”
In
the meantime, what do we do now? E.O. Wilson keeps emphasizing
conserving hotspots (his latest, perhaps bravest book is Half
Earth, arguing for putting half of the Earth aside for other
species). We will not be able to preserve coastal cities,
grainbelts, and fisheries. Conserving genetically diverse hot spots
will help prime the evolutionary pump for the next efflorescence, the
rapid speciation which will follow, when the time is ripe, the
current Sixth Extinction.
Even
if it is too late to save civilization, which has not been so kind to
the Earth community, even if we have broken our covenant with the
Unnameable, those of us who are faithful need to avoid cynicism and
despair. (Not easy, my friends!) We need to live and work as if
we were in covenant relationship with God. We need to
work to restore the covenant, recognizing that this will not bear
fruit in this incarnation of higher life. The end is near, and the
future will unfold, but living in affirmation of that future,
preserving what we can of gene pools and best practices, even as the
culture for those practices heads into its death spiral, is the task.
This is the huge role of spiritual leaders, conservationists,
traditional culture bearers, teachers, and honest, caring writers and
artists.
It is unutterably sad to observe
that the desperately needed transformation of humans simply has not
happened quickly enough to avert climate catastrophe. I mourn the end
of the holocene period and
the splendid, diverse
array of life the
era which
has been our home, the cenozoic. But the basis for
true hope lies in the regenerative potential of evolution on Earth.
In the end, we must not read
Biblical hope locally in terms of life in the holocene, or even in
terms of Earth. history
The Creator is not simply a middle eastern sky god hanging out in an
Islamic Paradise Garden trying to manage his wayward children. “He”
is the Unnameable,
creator and lord of worlds upon worlds, with no limits. Not
only does She (It)
not look
like your grandfather; God
isn’t even a noun, which is form of hypostasy and idolatry.
Godding (GK Chesterton)
is the process by which the indwelling Source manifests itself
throughout Creation.
I
have many conversations these days with folks where we agree that
those of us alive today will neither save nor lose the Earth, for she
will endure. The biggest fault in the Nathaniel Rich piece is in the
false title, chosen for dramatic effect, “Losing Earth.”
Balderdash. As I have posted here before, there are one to two
billion years of evolutionary history ahead of us on this sweet spot
in the Universe. And now astronomers and astrophysicists are
realizing another insight of the ancient Hindus, that the universe is
not a one-time event. It is not a Big Bang as much as a Big Bounce.
The cosmological theory that has reigned during my lifetime is fast
being replaced by one that fits the facts better. The universe
appears, ends, and reappears. It is regenerative. That is another
story, one which both reinforces a sense of covenant stewardship
towards the Deep Future and helps us forgive ourselves for failing
this time around.
Labels: Big Bounce, covenant, Craig Dilworth, EO Wilson, Great Filter, Hindu rocketry, hot spots, Joanna Macy, Robin Hanson, Thomas Berry